Your coding agent writes code.Now let it fix prod too.
If your team uses Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex, you know the workflow. When prod breaks, you’re grepping logs, adding console.logs, redeploying, hoping the AI’s guess is right. It can take hours.
Hyperprobe’s SDK lets your coding agent capture actual runtime state from your running services. Non-blocking probes, real variable values, fix in minutes.
Read-only. PII redacted by default. <1% overhead.
Works with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex & all other coding agents·Node.js·TypeScript·Java
40–60%
Snapshot captured.
Root cause in the same thread.
Your coding agent flags the suspect line. The SDK probes, captures the variable state, and hands it back. Your agent diagnoses, scopes the blast radius, and proposes a fix you can verify before merging. One conversation. One fix that works.
Thread not paused · Zero user impact
user.tier = 'free'
amount = 299.99
balance = None ← null silently
db_conn = timeout (3,000ms)
db.pool.active = 5 / 5 in use
db.pool.waiting = 12 queued
get_balance() returns None on DB timeout — the free-tier connection pool is saturated (5/5 slots). The code silently treats None as zero balance and throws InsufficientFunds. Users see the wrong error. Paid-tier pool is separate and unaffected.
847 failures · 89% free-tier · pool exhausted → null → wrong error shown
Pool 5→20. Raise DBTimeoutException explicitly, don't return None.
Circuit breaker on balance endpoint. Alert at pool > 80%.
When the log line isn't there, the AI guesses.And so do you.
AI writes more of your code every month. The dev debugging it didn't write it. The agent didn't predict where it would fail. So when something breaks, the variable you actually need to see was never logged — and neither of you has a way to find out what happened without redeploying.
High Error Rate — payment-service
Today at 23:04 IST · Assigned to on-call
23:04:17 ERROR payment-service: Transaction failed
user_id=usr_9182 amount=299.99
NullPointerException at line 32
PaymentService.processPayment(Order)
Real evidence. No redeploys.
Install the SDK once. When an incident fires, your coding agent picks the suspect line and tells HyperProbe to probe it. The SDK captures the exact variable state from your running service and hands it back. Your agent diagnoses from facts, not guesses.
Install the Agent
<dependency>
<groupId>io.hyperprobe</groupId>
<artifactId>agent</artifactId>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
Add the SDK dependency, instrument your service, deploy. Commit once — never touch it again.
Set a Breakpoint from IDE
Incident fires → open VS Code → click to set a live breakpoint. No redeploy. No restart.
Snapshot Captured
SNAPSHOT — line 34 · 14:23:07 UTC
Thread not paused · Zero user impact
b.amount = null
o.total = 299.99
o.userId = 'usr_9182'
process():34 → handleRequest():112
When the breakpoint is hit by a real request, Hyperprobe captures the full state without pausing the thread.
Same incident. Same engineer. Same logs.
One probe changes everything.
Here is exactly where the time goes, and where it disappears with Hyperprobe.
| What the engineer needs | LOGS + APM | With HyperProbe |
|---|---|---|
| Where did it break? | 5 min | 5 min |
| Which users are affected? | 25 min — tier not in logs, needs separate DB query | Instant — user.tier = 'free', 89% of failures |
| What did the database return? | 60 min — redeploy needed, not logged | Instant — balance = null, timed out after 3000ms |
| Why did the database fail? | 60 min — pool state invisible to logs | Instant — pool 5/5 full, 12 requests queued |
| What damage to users? | 90 min — silent null→zero only visible after multiple deploys | Instant — null treated as zero, user saw wrong error |
| Total Time | 3-4 hours | 9 minutes |
Where did it break?
Which users are affected?
What did the database return?
Why did the database fail?
What damage to users?
Total Incident Time
Your three hard requirements. Met.
Production debugging requires absolute data compliance. Hyperprobe redacts sensitive information locally, meaning database-level and token-level PII never leaves your networks.
Read-only architecture
The agent cannot mutate application state, cannot crash your pod, cannot affect customer requests. Probes capture variable values from running memory. They never write. Zero blast radius by design.
PII redaction in-memory
Sensitive data is masked at the agent, in your infrastructure, before any snapshot is captured. PII never leaves your network. You configure the redaction rules; we never see the raw values.
Zero AI training on your code
Your snapshots, your code paths, your runtime data are never used to train foundation models. Not by HyperProbe. Not by upstream providers. Your IP stays your IP.
See what our clients are saying.
Learn how our solutions have empowered our clients to debug in minutes.
"Sync issues used to take us days to reproduce locally. Hyperprobe caught the silent data mismatch in production on the first attempt."
Aishwarya Maurya
Tech Lead @ CheQ Digital
"During peak traffic, our listing service was black-boxing failures. Hyperprobe let us inspect the live memory state during the spike. We fixed the race condition in the same hour."
Bhagwan Bansal
SDE @ Housing.com
Questions engineers
actually ask.
Still got questions?
Schedule a short session with our platform engineering team.
Your next production bug is coming.— Does your team have —9 minutes or 4 hours?
Drop HyperProbe into your staging environment in 10 minutes. Let your coding agent solve a real bug today.
No change-board approval. No production risk. No commitment.
Works with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex · Node.js · TypeScript · Java · Early Access — Free to Start